Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in / Register
  • slapos slapos
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Merge requests 122
    • Merge requests 122
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Repository
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Jobs
  • Commits
Collapse sidebar
  • nexedi
  • slaposslapos
  • Merge requests
  • !797

Open
Created Aug 10, 2020 by Leo Le Bouter@lle-boutContributor
  • Report abuse
Report abuse

More fixes for PowerPC 64-bits

  • Overview 34
  • Commits 22
  • Pipelines 2
  • Changes 22

Still WIP.

I would need a review;

  • https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/slapos/commit/f48accbeb9eccf622ef99ddacfd665634b13c6c0

First, updates openblas to 0.3.10 because PowerPC 64-bits has proper support there, is that a problem? Second, I removed the BINARY variable because I noticed it auto-detects from running system, is that OK?

  • https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/slapos/commit/4b036c82444626806a7f48663c26a00ec4e5184e

I updated erp5's greenlet to 0.4.16 because it has proper PowerPC 64-bits support there, that should not have any greater impact, correct?

And for future reference, is there a way to make parts of a buildout configuration conditional for an architecture? I'm not speaking of shell commands but actual configuration.

Edited Aug 13, 2020 by Leo Le Bouter
Assignee
Assign to
Reviewer
Request review from
Time tracking
Source branch: lle-bout/ppc64le
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7